A Healthier Peer Review Process Would Improve Diversity
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The peer-review process.
Most authors experience that “sinking feeling” when reviewers’ comments and recommendations lead to rejection of a manuscript or the need for multiple revisions. It is important to bear in mind that this happens to most, if not all, scientists. Many times the reviewer or editor is correct, and with suitable revision, a better paper is ultimately published. Sometimes it is not. The author can th...
متن کاملThe peer-review process
The peer review process has been discussed at length in most of the established texts on the scholarly communication process, such as Ziman (1968), Ravetz (1973) and Meadows (1974). These authors agree that the four main functions of the scholarly literature are dissemination of current knowledge, archiving of the canonical knowledge base, quality control of published information, and assignmen...
متن کاملA Review on the Editorial Peer Review
Background and Objectives: The editorial peer review has an important role in the publication of scientific articles. Peers or reviewers are those scholars who have the expertise regarding the topic of a given article. They critically appraise the articles without having any monetary incentives or conflicts of interest. The aim of this study was to determine the most important aspects of the ed...
متن کاملFacilitating the Peer Review Process
Peer review, the process of improving the quality of work done by a peer of approximately equal caliber, is posited to be an effective educational tool and learning process. Unfortunately, many students participating in peer review lack confidence in the value of their feedback or experience difficulty maintaining interest in another student’s work, thus tending to create feedback that is super...
متن کاملConcerns about peer review process.
I am concerned about the lack of proper scrutiny during the peer review process. Although I exemplify it in one paper in a field in which I have some expertise, I believe that this single case shows severe failure of peer review, and it should not have happened. I refer to the article by Nankivil et al. in the latest edition of IOVS Vol 55 No. 7. There seems to be no evidence of scientific rigo...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
سال: 2020
ISSN: 1944-8244,1944-8252
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c11528